Leyland 344 or SOMECA 540 V/E?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Leyland 344: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on top speed.

  • The Leyland 344 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 42% (9.2 L/min / 2.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Leyland 344 suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Leyland 344 and SOMECA 540 V/E, with the call on each
Question344540 V/ECall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?33.5 kW (45.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”33.3 kW (44.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 540 V/E”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 344 and the 540 V/E.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 344 and the 540 V/E.
Which pumps more oil for implements?31.0 L/min (8.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 540 V/E”AheadThe Leyland 344 has 42% more hydraulic flow (9.2 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the SOMECA 540 V/E (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,520 kg (3,351 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”1,620 kg (3,571 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 540 V/E”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,125 kg (4,685 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”1,600 kg (3,527 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 540 V/E”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Leyland 344 is 33% heavier (525 kg / 1,157 lb) than the SOMECA 540 V/E (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 344 and the 540 V/E.
Which has the wider choice of gears?10Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 540 V/E”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 344 and the 540 V/E.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 540 V/E”AheadThe Leyland 344 has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the SOMECA 540 V/E (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 540 V/E”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 540 V/E”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 540 V/E”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1969–19721973–1982EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Leyland 344 has 42% more hydraulic flow (9.2 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the SOMECA 540 V/E (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Leyland 344 is 33% heavier (525 kg / 1,157 lb) than the SOMECA 540 V/E (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Leyland 344 has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the SOMECA 540 V/E (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources