Leyland 272 or SAME Aster 70 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the SAME Aster 70 (DT): hydraulic flow and three-point lift. It is also ahead on PTO speeds and drive.
- The SAME Aster 70 (DT) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The SAME Aster 70 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 66% (20.8 L/min / 5.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 31% (669 kg / 1,475 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 272 | Aster 70 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 43.4 kW (58.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 272” | 43.1 kW (57.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Aster 70” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 272 and the Aster 70 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 272 and the Aster 70 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 31.6 L/min (8.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 272” | 52.4 L/min (13.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Aster 70” | AheadThe SAME Aster 70 (DT) has 66% more hydraulic flow (20.8 L/min / 5.5 gpm) than the Leyland 272 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,131 kg (4,698 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 272” | 2,800 kg (6,173 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Aster 70” | AheadThe SAME Aster 70 (DT) has 31% more lift (669 kg / 1,475 lb) than the Leyland 272 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,032 kg (6,684 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 272” | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Aster 70” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Leyland 272 is 26% heavier (632 kg / 1,393 lb) than the SAME Aster 70 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 272 and the Aster 70 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 9 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 272” | 12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Aster 70” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 272 and the Aster 70 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 272” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Aster 70” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 272” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Aster 70” | AheadThe SAME Aster 70 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Leyland 272 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 272” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Aster 70” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 272” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Aster 70” | AheadThe SAME Aster 70 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Leyland 272 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1975–1980 | 1989–1996 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SAME Aster 70 (DT) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The SAME Aster 70 (DT) has 66% more hydraulic flow (20.8 L/min / 5.5 gpm) than the Leyland 272 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The SAME Aster 70 (DT) has 31% more lift (669 kg / 1,475 lb) than the Leyland 272 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Leyland 272 is 26% heavier (632 kg / 1,393 lb) than the SAME Aster 70 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The SAME Aster 70 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Leyland 272 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The SAME Aster 70 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Leyland 272 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The SAME Aster 70 (DT) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources