Leyland 255 or Renault 461 S?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the Leyland 255 is ahead on hydraulic flow; the Renault 461 S is ahead on three-point lift and top speed.

  • The Renault 461 S suits road haulage better on this data: 15% (4.0 km/h / 2.5 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Leyland 255 and Renault 461 S, with the call on each
Question255461 SCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?31.8 kW (42.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 255”31.9 kW (42.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 461S R7461”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 255 and the 461 S.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 255 and the 461 S.
Which pumps more oil for implements?29.5 L/min (7.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 255”24.5 L/min (6.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 461S R7461”AheadThe Leyland 255 has 20% more hydraulic flow (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Renault 461 S (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,875 kg (4,134 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 255”2,500 kg (5,512 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 461S R7461”AheadThe Renault 461 S has 33% more lift (625 kg / 1,378 lb) than the Leyland 255 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,470 kg (5,445 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 255”2,034 kg (4,484 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 461S R7461”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Leyland 255 is 21% heavier (436 kg / 961 lb) than the Renault 461 S (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 255 and the 461 S.
Which has the wider choice of gears?10Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 255”10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 461S R7461”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 461S R7461”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 255.
Which is faster on the road?26 km/h (16.2 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 255”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 461S R7461”AheadThe Renault 461 S has 15% more top speed (4.0 km/h / 2.5 mph) than the Leyland 255 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 255”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 461S R7461”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 255”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 461 S.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 255”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 461S R7461”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1973–19751980–1987Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 461 S is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Leyland 255 has 20% more hydraulic flow (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Renault 461 S (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 461 S has 33% more lift (625 kg / 1,378 lb) than the Leyland 255 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Leyland 255 is 21% heavier (436 kg / 961 lb) than the Renault 461 S (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 461 S has 15% more top speed (4.0 km/h / 2.5 mph) than the Leyland 255 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 461 S is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources