Leyland 2100 vs Massey Ferguson MF 1085

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1972–1980

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1973–1978

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 2100 and the MF 1085 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Leyland 2100 and Massey Ferguson MF 1085, field by field
Field	2100	MF 1085	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	100.0 hp	86.8 hp	+15% 2100
Engine declared	LEYLAND-MOTORS 6/98 NT	Perkins A 4.318	differs
Displacement declared	5.66 L	5.21 L	+9% 2100
Maximum torque declared	276 lb·ft · 374 N·m	256 lb·ft · 347 N·m	+8% 2100
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	+20% 2100
Clutch declared	Dry BORG & BECK double clutch	Pedal-operated dry LUK single-plate clutch with 305 mm diameter	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	11.0 gpm · 41.6 L/min	7.0 gpm · 26.5 L/min	+57% 2100
Pressure declared	—	3,086 psi · 213 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	6,030 lb · 2,735 kg	6,173 lb · 2,800 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	8,911 lb · 4,042 kg	8,490 lb · 3,851 kg	—
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	13,228 lb · 6,000 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	90.0 in · 2,286 mm	97.2 in · 2,470 mm	+8% MF 1085
Length declared	150.0 in · 3,810 mm	153.9 in · 3,910 mm	—
Width declared	85.5 in · 2,172 mm	114.2 in · 2,900 mm	+34% MF 1085
Height declared	98.8 in · 2,510 mm	79.1 in · 2,010 mm	+25% 2100
Ground clearance declared	15.8 in · 402 mm	16.5 in · 420 mm	—
Turning radius, braked declared	12.4 ft · 3.77 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	72.1 qt · 68.2 L	179.6 qt · 170.0 L	+149% MF 1085

Source

Source