Lanz D 9006 or Renault N 31?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Renault N 31 is ahead on top speed.
- The Renault N 31 suits road haulage better on this data: 34% (6.4 km/h / 4.0 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D 9006 | N 31 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 29.4 kW (39 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9006 Reingas” | 28.3 kW (38.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V31 R3051” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 9006 and the N 31. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 9006 and the N 31. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 14.0 L/min (3.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V31 R3051” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 9006. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the D 9006 and the N 31. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9006 Reingas” | 1,545 kg (3,406 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V31 R3051” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lanz D 9006 is 127% heavier (1,955 kg / 4,310 lb) than the Renault N 31 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D 9006 and the N 31. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9006 Reingas” | 6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V31 R3051” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 9006 and the N 31. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 18.6 km/h (11.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9006 Reingas” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V31 R3051” | AheadThe Renault N 31 has 34% more top speed (6.4 km/h / 4.0 mph) than the Lanz D 9006 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 630Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9006 Reingas” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V31 R3051” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the D 9006. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D 9006 and the N 31. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9006 Reingas” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V31 R3051” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1943–1945 | 1957–1962 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault N 31 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Lanz D 9006 is 127% heavier (1,955 kg / 4,310 lb) than the Renault N 31 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault N 31 has 34% more top speed (6.4 km/h / 4.0 mph) than the Lanz D 9006 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Renault N 31 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources