Lanz D 6510 or Schlüter DMZ 16?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D 6510 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the DMZ 16 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Schlüter DMZ 16 suits road haulage better on this data: 60% (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D 6510 | DMZ 16 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 11 kW (15 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 6510” | 11.8 kW (16 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter DZM 16” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 6510 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the DMZ 16 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 6510 and the DMZ 16. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 6510 and the DMZ 16. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 6510 and the DMZ 16. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the D 6510 and the DMZ 16. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,380 kg (7,452 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 6510” | 1,650 kg (3,638 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter DZM 16” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lanz D 6510 is 105% heavier (1,730 kg / 3,814 lb) than the Schlüter DMZ 16 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D 6510 and the DMZ 16. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 3Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 6510” | 4Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter DZM 16” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): fewer than 2 gears apart. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 6510 and the DMZ 16. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 9.0 km/h (5.6 mph) to 10.0 km/h (6.2 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 6510” | 16 km/h (9.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter DZM 16” | AheadThe Schlüter DMZ 16 has 60% more top speed (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) than the Lanz D 6510 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 500Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 6510” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter DZM 16” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the D 6510. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D 6510 and the DMZ 16. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 6510” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter DZM 16” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1929–1935 | 1938–1939 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Schlüter DMZ 16 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Lanz D 6510 is 105% heavier (1,730 kg / 3,814 lb) than the Schlüter DMZ 16 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Schlüter DMZ 16 has 60% more top speed (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) than the Lanz D 6510 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Schlüter DMZ 16 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): fewer than 2 gears apart.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 6510 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the DMZ 16 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources