Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) or WHITE 2-45?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-45 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The WHITE 2-45 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 24% (460 kg / 1,014 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) | 2-45 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 35.3 kW (47.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA” | 35.3 kW (47.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-45” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-45 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) and the 2-45. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) and the 2-45. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 37.1 L/min (9.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2-45. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,633 kg (3,600 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA” | 1,522 kg (3,355 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-45” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,905 kg (4,200 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA” | 2,365 kg (5,214 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-45” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The WHITE 2-45 is 24% heavier (460 kg / 1,014 lb) than the Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) and the 2-45. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA” | 20Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-45” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-45” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-45” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-45” | AheadThe Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 2-45 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) and the 2-45. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-45” | AheadThe WHITE 2-45 is available with four-wheel drive; the Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1983–1987 | 1980–1981 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The WHITE 2-45 is 24% heavier (460 kg / 1,014 lb) than the Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 2-45 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The WHITE 2-45 is available with four-wheel drive; the Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-45 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources