Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) or VOLVO-BM T 430?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F): hydraulic flow.

  • The Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 12% (4.1 L/min / 1.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) and VOLVO-BM T 430, with the call on each
QuestionTL 33 N/A (R 5530 F)T 430Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?32.4 kW (43.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA”32.2 kW (43.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 430 Buster”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) and the T 430.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) and the T 430.
Which pumps more oil for implements?37.1 L/min (9.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA”33.0 L/min (8.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 430 Buster”AheadThe Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) has 12% more hydraulic flow (4.1 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the VOLVO-BM T 430 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,633 kg (3,600 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the T 430.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,905 kg (4,200 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA”2,398 kg (5,287 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 430 Buster”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VOLVO-BM T 430 is 26% heavier (493 kg / 1,087 lb) than the Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) and the T 430.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA”8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 430 Buster”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) and the T 430.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 430 Buster”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 430 Buster”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) and the T 430.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 430 Buster”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1983–19871969–1978Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) has 12% more hydraulic flow (4.1 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the VOLVO-BM T 430 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The VOLVO-BM T 430 is 26% heavier (493 kg / 1,087 lb) than the Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources