Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) or Renault 80?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) is ahead on hydraulic flow, forward gears, top speed and PTO speeds; the Renault 80 is ahead on three-point lift.

  • The Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
  • The Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) and Renault 80, with the call on each
QuestionTL 33 N/A (R 5530 F)80Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?32.4 kW (43.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA”32.2 kW (43.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80 R7282”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) and the 80.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) and the 80.
Which pumps more oil for implements?37.1 L/min (9.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA”23.2 L/min (6.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80 R7282”AheadThe Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) has 60% more hydraulic flow (13.9 L/min / 3.7 gpm) than the Renault 80 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,633 kg (3,600 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA”1,850 kg (4,079 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80 R7282”AheadThe Renault 80 has 13% more lift (217 kg / 478 lb) than the Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?1,905 kg (4,200 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA”1,645 kg (3,627 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80 R7282”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) is 16% heavier (260 kg / 573 lb) than the Renault 80 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) and the 80.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA”8Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80 R7282”AheadThe Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Renault 80 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) and the 80.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80 R7282”AheadThe Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 80 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80 R7282”AheadThe Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 80 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80 R7282”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F).
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 33 NA”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80 R7282”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1983–19871968–1977Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) has 60% more hydraulic flow (13.9 L/min / 3.7 gpm) than the Renault 80 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 80 has 13% more lift (217 kg / 478 lb) than the Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) is 16% heavier (260 kg / 573 lb) than the Renault 80 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Renault 80 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 80 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 80 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Landini TL 33 N/A (R 5530 F) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources