Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) or Renault 70-32 PX?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 70-32 PX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) | 70-32 PX | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini R 6560 L (DT)” | 47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3131” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 70-32 PX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) and the 70-32 PX. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) and the 70-32 PX. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 42.3 L/min (11.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini R 6560 L (DT)” | 32.1 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3131” | AheadThe Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) has 32% more hydraulic flow (10.2 L/min / 2.7 gpm) than the Renault 70-32 PX (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,100 kg (4,630 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini R 6560 L (DT)” | 2,870 kg (6,327 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3131” | AheadThe Renault 70-32 PX has 37% more lift (770 kg / 1,698 lb) than the Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,270 kg (5,004 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini R 6560 L (DT)” | 2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3131” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 70-32 PX is 28% heavier (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) and the 70-32 PX. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Landini R 6560 L (DT)” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3131” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) and the 70-32 PX. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini R 6560 L (DT)” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3131” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini R 6560 L (DT)” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3131” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3131” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini R 6560 L (DT)” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-32 PE/PA/PS/PX R3131” | AheadThe Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 70-32 PX is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1988–2000 | 1989–1992 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) has 32% more hydraulic flow (10.2 L/min / 2.7 gpm) than the Renault 70-32 PX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 70-32 PX has 37% more lift (770 kg / 1,698 lb) than the Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 70-32 PX is 28% heavier (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 70-32 PX is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 70-32 PX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources