Landini 165 DT or ZETOR 16145?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 165 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 16145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Landini 165 DT suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 33% (15.2 L/min / 4.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 165 DT | 16145 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 117.7 kW (157.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165” | 117.7 kW (157.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16145” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 165 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 16145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 165 DT and the 16145. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 165 DT and the 16145. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 61.5 L/min (16.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165” | 46.3 L/min (12.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16145” | AheadThe Landini 165 DT has 33% more hydraulic flow (15.2 L/min / 4.0 gpm) than the ZETOR 16145 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 8,400 kg (18,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165” | 5,150 kg (11,354 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16145” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 165 DT: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165”); the 16145: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16145”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,880 kg (12,963 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165” | 5,100 kg (11,244 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16145” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini 165 DT is 15% heavier (780 kg / 1,720 lb) than the ZETOR 16145 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 13,800 kg (30,424 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 16145. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 36 to 72Traktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16145” | AheadThe Landini 165 DT has 125% more forward gears (20 gears) than the ZETOR 16145 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 165 DT and the 16145. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16145” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16145” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 16145. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16145” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1997–2001 | 1984–1990 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini 165 DT is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Landini 165 DT has 33% more hydraulic flow (15.2 L/min / 4.0 gpm) than the ZETOR 16145 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 165 DT is 15% heavier (780 kg / 1,720 lb) than the ZETOR 16145 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 165 DT has 125% more forward gears (20 gears) than the ZETOR 16145 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 165 DT is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 165 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 16145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 165 DT: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165”); the 16145: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16145”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources