Landini 9800 (DT) or ZETOR 12011/12045?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Landini 9800 (DT): three-point lift. It is also ahead on forward gears.

  • The Landini 9800 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 18% (720 kg / 1,587 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Landini 9800 (DT) and ZETOR 12011/12045, with the call on each
Question9800 (DT)12011/12045Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?58.0 kW (77.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”58.3 kW (78.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 12011/12045”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9800 (DT) and the 12011/12045.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9800 (DT) and the 12011/12045.
Which pumps more oil for implements?51.1 L/min (13.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 12011/12045.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,670 kg (10,296 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”3,950 kg (8,708 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 12011/12045”AheadThe Landini 9800 (DT) has 18% more lift (720 kg / 1,587 lb) than the ZETOR 12011/12045 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,080 kg (8,995 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”4,165 kg (9,182 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 12011/12045”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,800 kg (14,991 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 12011/12045.
Which has the wider choice of gears?32Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”16Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 12011/12045”AheadThe Landini 9800 (DT) has 100% more forward gears (16 gears) than the ZETOR 12011/12045 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9800 (DT) and the 12011/12045.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 12011/12045”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 12011/12045”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 12011/12045.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 12011/12045”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1987–20001974–1984Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini 9800 (DT) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Landini 9800 (DT) has 18% more lift (720 kg / 1,587 lb) than the ZETOR 12011/12045 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini 9800 (DT) has 100% more forward gears (16 gears) than the ZETOR 12011/12045 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini 9800 (DT) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources