Landini R-7860 (DT) TL-20 N/M (TL-20 DT/M) or URSUS 5312/5314?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the R-7860 (DT) TL-20 N/M (TL-20 DT/M) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5312/5314 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The URSUS 5312/5314 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 65% (24.1 L/min / 6.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 22% (469 kg / 1,034 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Landini R-7860 (DT) TL-20 N/M (TL-20 DT/M) and URSUS 5312/5314, with the call on each
QuestionR-7860 (DT) TL-20 N/M (TL-20 DT/M)5312/5314Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?52.2 kW (70.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 7860”52.2 kW (70.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-7860 (DT) TL-20 N/M (TL-20 DT/M) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5312/5314 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the R-7860 (DT) TL-20 N/M (TL-20 DT/M) and the 5312/5314.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the R-7860 (DT) TL-20 N/M (TL-20 DT/M) and the 5312/5314.
Which pumps more oil for implements?37.2 L/min (9.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 7860”61.3 L/min (16.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”AheadThe URSUS 5312/5314 has 65% more hydraulic flow (24.1 L/min / 6.4 gpm) than the Landini R-7860 (DT) TL-20 N/M (TL-20 DT/M) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,131 kg (4,698 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 7860”2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”AheadThe URSUS 5312/5314 has 22% more lift (469 kg / 1,034 lb) than the Landini R-7860 (DT) TL-20 N/M (TL-20 DT/M) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,860 kg (6,305 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 7860”3,180 kg (7,011 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The URSUS 5312/5314 is 11% heavier (320 kg / 705 lb) than the Landini R-7860 (DT) TL-20 N/M (TL-20 DT/M) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R-7860 (DT) TL-20 N/M (TL-20 DT/M) and the 5312/5314.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 7860”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the R-7860 (DT) TL-20 N/M (TL-20 DT/M) and the 5312/5314.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 7860”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 7860”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 7860”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 5312/5314.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 7860”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1988–20001993–2003Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The URSUS 5312/5314 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The URSUS 5312/5314 has 65% more hydraulic flow (24.1 L/min / 6.4 gpm) than the Landini R-7860 (DT) TL-20 N/M (TL-20 DT/M) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The URSUS 5312/5314 has 22% more lift (469 kg / 1,034 lb) than the Landini R-7860 (DT) TL-20 N/M (TL-20 DT/M) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The URSUS 5312/5314 is 11% heavier (320 kg / 705 lb) than the Landini R-7860 (DT) TL-20 N/M (TL-20 DT/M) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The URSUS 5312/5314 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-7860 (DT) TL-20 N/M (TL-20 DT/M) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5312/5314 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources