Landini 7800-Turbo (DT) or ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007): hydraulic flow and three-point lift. It is also ahead on top speed and PTO speeds. On features, the Landini 7800-Turbo (DT) is ahead on forward gears.

  • The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 750 rpm.
  • The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 12% (6.0 L/min / 1.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 60% (2,110 kg / 4,652 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Landini 7800-Turbo (DT) and ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007), with the call on each
Question7800-Turbo (DT)8641 (2002-2007)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?55.3 kW (74.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 7800 DT Turbo”55.6 kW (74.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 7800-Turbo (DT) and the 8641 (2002-2007).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 7800-Turbo (DT) and the 8641 (2002-2007).
Which pumps more oil for implements?51.0 L/min (13.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 7800 DT Turbo”57.0 L/min (15.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)”AheadThe ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) has 12% more hydraulic flow (6.0 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Landini 7800-Turbo (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,540 kg (7,804 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 7800 DT Turbo”5,650 kg (12,456 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)”AheadThe ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) has 60% more lift (2,110 kg / 4,652 lb) than the Landini 7800-Turbo (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,815 kg (8,411 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 7800 DT Turbo”4,255 kg (9,381 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) is 12% heavier (440 kg / 970 lb) than the Landini 7800-Turbo (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,700 kg (14,771 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 7800-Turbo (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?32Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 7800 DT Turbo”24Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)”AheadThe Landini 7800-Turbo (DT) has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 7800-Turbo (DT) and the 8641 (2002-2007).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 7800 DT Turbo”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)”AheadThe ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Landini 7800-Turbo (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 7800 DT Turbo”540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)”AheadThe ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Landini 7800-Turbo (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 7800 DT Turbo”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 7800 DT Turbo”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1987–20002002–2007Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) has 12% more hydraulic flow (6.0 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Landini 7800-Turbo (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) has 60% more lift (2,110 kg / 4,652 lb) than the Landini 7800-Turbo (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) is 12% heavier (440 kg / 970 lb) than the Landini 7800-Turbo (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini 7800-Turbo (DT) has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Landini 7800-Turbo (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Landini 7800-Turbo (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources