Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) vs URSUS C-360

12 material differences

Tractor one

1983–1987

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1976–1994

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) and the C-360 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

12 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) and URSUS C-360, field by field
Field	6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B)	C-360	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	55.3 hp	51.2 hp	+8% 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B)
Engine declared	Perkins AT 3.152-4	URSUS/ZM S-4003	differs
Displacement declared	2.50 L	3.12 L	+25% C-360
Maximum torque declared	131 lb·ft · 178 N·m	140 lb·ft · 190 N·m	+7% C-360
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	+20% 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B)
Clutch declared	Dry and air-cooled OMG or LuK double clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	9.6 gpm · 36.5 L/min	6.9 gpm · 26.3 L/min	+39% 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B)
Pressure declared	2,901 psi · 200 bar	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	4,429 lb · 2,009 kg	2,646 lb · 1,200 kg	+67% 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B)
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	4,971 lb · 2,255 kg	4,784 lb · 2,170 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	81.9 in · 2,080 mm	83.7 in · 2,125 mm	—
Length declared	138.2 in · 3,510 mm	140.6 in · 3,571 mm	—
Width declared	75.6 in · 1,920 mm	70.9 in · 1,800 mm	+7% 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B)
Height declared	91.9 in · 2,335 mm	80.7 in · 2,050 mm	+14% 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B)
Ground clearance declared	19.5 in · 495 mm	15.6 in · 395 mm	+25% 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B)
Turning radius, braked declared	12.4 ft · 3.79 m	11.1 ft · 3.37 m	+12% 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B)
Fuel tank declared	63.9 qt · 60.5 L	74.0 qt · 70.0 L	+16% C-360

Source

Source