Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) or OLIVER 1355 (4 WD)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B): hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on top speed and PTO speeds.
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 67% (14.7 L/min / 3.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) | 1355 (4 WD) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 34.9 kW (46.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 35.1 kW (47.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1355” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) and the 1355 (4 WD). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) and the 1355 (4 WD). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 36.5 L/min (9.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1355” | AheadThe Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has 67% more hydraulic flow (14.7 L/min / 3.9 gpm) than the OLIVER 1355 (4 WD) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,009 kg (4,429 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 1355 (4 WD). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,255 kg (4,971 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1355” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) is 13% heavier (255 kg / 562 lb) than the OLIVER 1355 (4 WD) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) and the 1355 (4 WD). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1355” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) and the 1355 (4 WD). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1355” | AheadThe Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the OLIVER 1355 (4 WD) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1355” | AheadThe Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the OLIVER 1355 (4 WD) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) and the 1355 (4 WD). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1355” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1983–1987 | 1969–1971 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has 67% more hydraulic flow (14.7 L/min / 3.9 gpm) than the OLIVER 1355 (4 WD) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) is 13% heavier (255 kg / 562 lb) than the OLIVER 1355 (4 WD) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the OLIVER 1355 (4 WD) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the OLIVER 1355 (4 WD) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources