Landini 12.500 (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 2645?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 12.500 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 2645 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Landini 12.500 (DT) and Massey Ferguson MF 2645, with the call on each
Question12.500 (DT)MF 2645Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?80.9 kW (108.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”81 kW (109 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2645”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 12.500 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 2645 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 12.500 (DT) and the MF 2645.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 12.500 (DT) and the MF 2645.
Which pumps more oil for implements?62.0 L/min (16.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 2645.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”6,300 kg (13,889 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2645”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 12.500 (DT): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”); the MF 2645: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2645”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,810 kg (10,604 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”5,630 kg (12,412 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2645”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 2645 is 17% heavier (820 kg / 1,808 lb) than the Landini 12.500 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2645”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 12.500 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2645”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 2645 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Landini 12.500 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 12.500 (DT) and the MF 2645.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2645”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2645”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2645”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2645”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1978–19901985–1986Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 2645 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 2645 is 17% heavier (820 kg / 1,808 lb) than the Landini 12.500 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 2645 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Landini 12.500 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 2645 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 12.500 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 2645 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 12.500 (DT): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”); the MF 2645: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2645”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources