Landini 11800 (DT) or ZETOR 11641?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the ZETOR 11641: hydraulic flow, three-point lift and maximum permissible mass. On features, the Landini 11800 (DT) is ahead on forward gears.
- The ZETOR 11641 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 27% (13.8 L/min / 3.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 20% (918 kg / 2,024 lb) more three-point lift.
- The ZETOR 11641 suits road haulage better on this data: 11% (800 kg / 1,764 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 11800 (DT) | 11641 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 64.8 kW (86.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | 64.6 kW (86.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 11800 (DT) and the 11641. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 11800 (DT) and the 11641. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 51.2 L/min (13.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | 65.0 L/min (17.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)” | AheadThe ZETOR 11641 has 27% more hydraulic flow (13.8 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the Landini 11800 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,497 kg (9,914 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | 5,415 kg (11,938 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)” | AheadThe ZETOR 11641 has 20% more lift (918 kg / 2,024 lb) than the Landini 11800 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,390 kg (9,678 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | 4,645 kg (10,240 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | 7,800 kg (17,196 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)” | AheadThe ZETOR 11641 has 11% higher maximum permissible mass (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the Landini 11800 (DT) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 32Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)” | AheadThe Landini 11800 (DT) has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the ZETOR 11641 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 11800 (DT) and the 11641. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 11800 (DT). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1987–2000 | 1999–2002 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 11641 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ZETOR 11641 has 27% more hydraulic flow (13.8 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the Landini 11800 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 11641 has 20% more lift (918 kg / 2,024 lb) than the Landini 11800 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 11641 has 11% higher maximum permissible mass (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the Landini 11800 (DT) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 11800 (DT) has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the ZETOR 11641 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 11641 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources