Landini 11800 (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 3090 (A)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Landini 11800 (DT): three-point lift.

  • The Landini 11800 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 16% (622 kg / 1,371 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Landini 11800 (DT) and Massey Ferguson MF 3090 (A), with the call on each
Question11800 (DT)MF 3090 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?64.8 kW (86.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT”64.7 kW (86.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 11800 (DT) and the MF 3090 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 11800 (DT) and the MF 3090 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?51.2 L/min (13.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT”51.2 L/min (13.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,497 kg (9,914 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT”3,875 kg (8,543 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”AheadThe Landini 11800 (DT) has 16% more lift (622 kg / 1,371 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3090 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,390 kg (9,678 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT”4,190 kg (9,237 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT”7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?32Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT”32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 11800 (DT) and the MF 3090 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 11800 (DT).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1987–20001986–1990EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Landini 11800 (DT) has 16% more lift (622 kg / 1,371 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3090 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources