Landini 10800 (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Landini 10800 (DT): hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on forward gears.
- The Landini 10800 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 17% (7.5 L/min / 2.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 10800 (DT) | MF 1007 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 62.9 kW (84.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | 62.6 kW (83.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 10800 (DT) and the MF 1007 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 10800 (DT) and the MF 1007 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 51.2 L/min (13.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | 43.7 L/min (11.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007” | AheadThe Landini 10800 (DT) has 17% more hydraulic flow (7.5 L/min / 2.0 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | 4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | 3,580 kg (7,893 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini 10800 (DT) is 20% heavier (720 kg / 1,587 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | 6,500 kg (14,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 32Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007” | AheadThe Landini 10800 (DT) has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 10800 (DT) and the MF 1007 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 1007 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1987–2000 | 1987–1994 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Landini 10800 (DT) has 17% more hydraulic flow (7.5 L/min / 2.0 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 10800 (DT) is 20% heavier (720 kg / 1,587 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 10800 (DT) has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources