7 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor oneLamborghini SAME Rubin 2002000–2004No measured PTO figureTractor twoRenault Ares 836 RZ2001–2005No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the SAME Rubin 200 and the Ares 836 RZ → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

7 material differences · 7 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Lamborghini SAME Rubin 200 and Renault Ares 836 RZ, field by field
FieldSAME Rubin 200Ares 836 RZGap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed192.3 hp191.5 hp—
Engine declaredSAME 1000.6 WTI-4JOHN DEERE 6068 HRT 72differs
Displacement declared6.00 L6.79 L+13% Ares 836 RZ
Maximum torque declared518 lb·ft · 702 N·m575 lb·ft · 780 N·m+11% Ares 836 RZ
Transmission
Top speed declared24.9 mph · 40 km/h24.9 mph · 40 km/h—
Clutch declaredHydraulically operated wet multi-plate clutch with eight discs of 168 mm diameterPedal operated driving clutch with six plates and 230 mm disc diameterdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared—Closed centre—
Pump flow declared20.8 gpm · 78.6 L/min——
Pressure declared—2,857 psi · 197 bar—
Rear PTO speeds declared540/1000 rpm540/1000 rpm—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared15,873 lb · 7,200 kg17,968 lb · 8,150 kg+13% Ares 836 RZ
Maximum permissible mass declared—26,455 lb · 12,000 kg—
Wheelbase declared112.2 in · 2,850 mm113.2 in · 2,876 mm—
Length declared191.4 in · 4,861 mm192.1 in · 4,880 mm—
Width declared95.5 in · 2,426 mm101.8–112.6 in · 2,585–2,860 mmdiffers
Height, over the cab declared116.9 in · 2,970 mm119.5 in · 3,035 mm—
Ground clearance declared23.4 in · 594 mm23.2 in · 590 mm—
Turning radius, braked declared—16.1 ft · 4.90 m—
Fuel tank declared422.7 qt · 400.0 L317.0 qt · 300.0 L+33% SAME Rubin 200

Lamborghini SAME Rubin 200 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 200”

Renault Ares 836 RZ sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ”
  • Source: OECD test report 2109, 2004