Lamborghini SAME Rubin 200 or New Holland TM 190 (Traktorenlexikon)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the SAME Rubin 200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The New Holland TM 190 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 38% (29.9 L/min / 7.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | SAME Rubin 200 | TM 190 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 143.4 kW (192.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 200” | 142.7 kW (191.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 190” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the SAME Rubin 200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the SAME Rubin 200 and the TM 190. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the SAME Rubin 200 and the TM 190. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 78.6 L/min (20.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 200” | 108.5 L/min (28.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 190” | AheadThe New Holland TM 190 has 38% more hydraulic flow (29.9 L/min / 7.9 gpm) than the Lamborghini SAME Rubin 200 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the SAME Rubin 200 and the TM 190. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,200 kg (15,873 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 200” | 7,510 kg (16,557 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 190” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 190” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the SAME Rubin 200. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 27Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 200” | 18 to 19Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 190” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the SAME Rubin 200 and the TM 190. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 200” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 190” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 200” | 540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 190” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 200” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 190” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 200” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 190”; OECD test report 2144, 2004 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2000–2004 | 2002–2007 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland TM 190 has 38% more hydraulic flow (29.9 L/min / 7.9 gpm) than the Lamborghini SAME Rubin 200 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the SAME Rubin 200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources