Lamborghini R-603 (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 560?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the R-603 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 560 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Lamborghini R-603 (DT) and Massey Ferguson MF 560, with the call on each
QuestionR-603 (DT)MF 560Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?41.2 kW (55.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 603 DT”41.2 kW (55.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 560”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-603 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 560 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the R-603 (DT) and the MF 560.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the R-603 (DT) and the MF 560.
Which pumps more oil for implements?18.5 L/min (4.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 603 DT”—No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 560.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?—1,800 kg (3,968 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 560”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the R-603 (DT).
Which is heavier, for traction?1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 603 DT”2,770 kg (6,107 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 560”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 560 is 46% heavier (870 kg / 1,918 lb) than the Lamborghini R-603 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R-603 (DT) and the MF 560.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 603 DT”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 560”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the R-603 (DT) and the MF 560.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 603 DT”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 560”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 603 DT”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 560”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 560”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the R-603 (DT).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 603 DT”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 560”AheadThe Lamborghini R-603 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson 560 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1973–19821976–1979EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson 560 is 46% heavier (870 kg / 1,918 lb) than the Lamborghini R-603 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini R-603 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson 560 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-603 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 560 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources