Lamborghini R.1506 DT or Renault 160-94 TZ/TX?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the R.1506 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 160-94 TZ/TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Renault 160-94 TZ/TX suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | R.1506 DT | 160-94 TZ/TX | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 110.3 kW (147.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | 110.4 kW (148.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R.1506 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 160-94 TZ/TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the R.1506 DT and the 160-94 TZ/TX. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the R.1506 DT and the 160-94 TZ/TX. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 66.2 L/min (17.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | 58.7 L/min (15.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | AheadThe Lamborghini R.1506 DT has 13% more hydraulic flow (7.5 L/min / 2.0 gpm) than the Renault 160-94 TZ/TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,680 kg (14,727 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | 11,020 kg (24,295 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | AheadThe Renault 160-94 TZ/TX has 65% more lift (4,340 kg / 9,568 lb) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,695 kg (12,555 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | 6,275 kg (13,834 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 160-94 TZ/TX is 10% heavier (580 kg / 1,279 lb) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 9,750 kg (21,495 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R.1506 DT. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | 27Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the R.1506 DT and the 160-94 TZ/TX. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | AheadThe Renault 160-94 TZ/TX has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 160-94 TZ/TX. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 160-94 TX/TZ R3842” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2004– | 1993–1997 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini R.1506 DT is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Lamborghini R.1506 DT has 13% more hydraulic flow (7.5 L/min / 2.0 gpm) than the Renault 160-94 TZ/TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 160-94 TZ/TX has 65% more lift (4,340 kg / 9,568 lb) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 160-94 TZ/TX is 10% heavier (580 kg / 1,279 lb) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 160-94 TZ/TX has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini R.1506 DT is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R.1506 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 160-94 TZ/TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources