Lamborghini R.1506 DT or Lamborghini Rubin 150?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the R.1506 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Rubin 150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Lamborghini Rubin 150 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 29% (1,920 kg / 4,233 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Lamborghini Rubin 150 suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | R.1506 DT | Rubin 150 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 110.3 kW (147.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | 110.3 kW (147.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R.1506 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Rubin 150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the R.1506 DT and the Rubin 150. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the R.1506 DT and the Rubin 150. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 66.2 L/min (17.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | 70.5 L/min (18.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,680 kg (14,727 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | 8,600 kg (18,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150” | AheadThe Lamborghini Rubin 150 has 29% more lift (1,920 kg / 4,233 lb) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,695 kg (12,555 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | 6,845 kg (15,091 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini Rubin 150 is 20% heavier (1,150 kg / 2,535 lb) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R.1506 DT. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | 18 to 27Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the R.1506 DT and the Rubin 150. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150” | AheadThe Lamborghini Rubin 150 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2004– | 1998–2004 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini R.1506 DT is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Lamborghini Rubin 150 has 29% more lift (1,920 kg / 4,233 lb) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini Rubin 150 is 20% heavier (1,150 kg / 2,535 lb) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini Rubin 150 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini R.1506 DT is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R.1506 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Rubin 150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources