Lamborghini Premium 850 (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 6245 (A)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Massey Ferguson MF 6245 (A): hydraulic flow, three-point lift and maximum permissible mass.
- The Massey Ferguson MF 6245 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 107% (43.7 L/min / 11.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 18% (650 kg / 1,433 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Massey Ferguson MF 6245 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 47% (2,800 kg / 6,173 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Premium 850 (DT) | MF 6245 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 58.9 kW (79.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 850 DT A” | 59.3 kW (79.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6245” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Premium 850 (DT) and the MF 6245 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Premium 850 (DT) and the MF 6245 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 41.0 L/min (10.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 850 DT A” | 84.7 L/min (22.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6245” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6245 (A) has 107% more hydraulic flow (43.7 L/min / 11.5 gpm) than the Lamborghini Premium 850 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,600 kg (7,937 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 850 DT A” | 4,250 kg (9,370 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6245” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6245 (A) has 18% more lift (650 kg / 1,433 lb) than the Lamborghini Premium 850 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,630 kg (8,003 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 850 DT A” | 3,920 kg (8,642 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6245” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 850 DT A” | 8,800 kg (19,401 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6245” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6245 (A) has 47% higher maximum permissible mass (2,800 kg / 6,173 lb) than the Lamborghini Premium 850 (DT) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 20 to 60Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 850 DT A” | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6245” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Premium 850 (DT) and the MF 6245 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 850 DT A” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6245” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 850 DT A” | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6245” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6245” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Premium 850 (DT). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 850 DT A” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6245” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1995–2004 | 1999–2003 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson MF 6245 (A) has 107% more hydraulic flow (43.7 L/min / 11.5 gpm) than the Lamborghini Premium 850 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 6245 (A) has 18% more lift (650 kg / 1,433 lb) than the Lamborghini Premium 850 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 6245 (A) has 47% higher maximum permissible mass (2,800 kg / 6,173 lb) than the Lamborghini Premium 850 (DT) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources