Lamborghini 1060 DT or ZETOR 10641?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 1060 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The ZETOR 10641 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 61% (25.0 L/min / 6.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 23% (1,082 kg / 2,385 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 1060 DT | 10641 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 1060 DT A” | 77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1060 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1060 DT and the 10641. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1060 DT and the 10641. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 41.0 L/min (10.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 1060 DT A” | 66.0 L/min (17.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | AheadThe ZETOR 10641 has 61% more hydraulic flow (25.0 L/min / 6.6 gpm) than the Lamborghini 1060 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,700 kg (10,362 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 1060 DT A” | 5,782 kg (12,747 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | AheadThe ZETOR 10641 has 23% more lift (1,082 kg / 2,385 lb) than the Lamborghini 1060 DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,720 kg (10,406 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 1060 DT A” | 4,075 kg (8,984 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini 1060 DT is 16% heavier (645 kg / 1,422 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 1060 DT A” | 6,700 kg (14,771 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 20 to 60Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 1060 DT A” | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1060 DT and the 10641. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 1060 DT A” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 1060 DT A” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1060 DT. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 1060 DT A” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1995–2004 | 1999–2002 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ZETOR 10641 has 61% more hydraulic flow (25.0 L/min / 6.6 gpm) than the Lamborghini 1060 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 10641 has 23% more lift (1,082 kg / 2,385 lb) than the Lamborghini 1060 DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini 1060 DT is 16% heavier (645 kg / 1,422 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1060 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources