Lamborghini 564-60 (DT) or SAME Solar 60 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Lamborghini 564-60 (DT): hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on PTO speeds.
- The Lamborghini 564-60 (DT) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The Lamborghini 564-60 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 13% (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 564-60 (DT) | Solar 60 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 37.2 kW (49.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 564-60 DT A Crono” | 37.2 kW (49.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solar 60” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 564-60 (DT) and the Solar 60 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 564-60 (DT) and the Solar 60 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 564-60 DT A Crono” | 32.0 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solar 60” | AheadThe Lamborghini 564-60 (DT) has 13% more hydraulic flow (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the SAME Solar 60 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 564-60 DT A Crono” | 2,970 kg (6,548 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solar 60” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,060 kg (4,542 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 564-60 DT A Crono” | 2,080 kg (4,586 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solar 60” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,600 kg (10,141 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 564-60 DT A Crono” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Solar 60 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 564-60 DT A Crono” | 12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solar 60” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 564-60 (DT) and the Solar 60 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 564-60 DT A Crono” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solar 60” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 564-60 DT A Crono” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Solar 60” | AheadThe Lamborghini 564-60 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SAME Solar 60 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 564-60 DT A Crono” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Solar 60” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 564-60 DT A Crono” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Solar 60” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–2004 | 1986–1997 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini 564-60 (DT) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Lamborghini 564-60 (DT) has 13% more hydraulic flow (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the SAME Solar 60 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini 564-60 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SAME Solar 60 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Lamborghini 564-60 (DT) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources