Lamborghini 190 Racing or Massey Ferguson MF 2775?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 190 Racing has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 2775 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Lamborghini 190 Racing suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 11% (5.8 L/min / 1.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Lamborghini 190 Racing suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
- The Lamborghini 190 Racing suits road haulage better on this data: 13% (4.5 km/h / 2.8 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 190 Racing | MF 2775 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 139 kW (186 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 190 DT A Racing” | 139.7 kW (187.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 190 Racing has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 2775 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 190 Racing and the MF 2775. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 190 Racing and the MF 2775. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 60.8 L/min (16.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 190 DT A Racing” | 55.0 L/min (14.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | AheadThe Lamborghini 190 Racing has 11% more hydraulic flow (5.8 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson 2775 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 8,600 kg (18,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 190 DT A Racing” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the MF 2775. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,360 kg (14,021 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 190 DT A Racing” | 6,038 kg (13,312 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 190 DT A Racing” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 2775. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 27Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 190 DT A Racing” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | AheadThe Lamborghini 190 Racing has 238% more forward gears (19 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 2775 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 190 Racing and the MF 2775. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 190 DT A Racing” | 35.5 km/h (22.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | AheadThe Lamborghini 190 Racing has 13% more top speed (4.5 km/h / 2.8 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 2775 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 190 DT A Racing” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | AheadThe Lamborghini 190 Racing offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson 2775 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 190 Racing and the MF 2775. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 190 DT A Racing” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | AheadThe Lamborghini 190 Racing is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson 2775 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1992–2001 | 1977–1983 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini 190 Racing is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Lamborghini 190 Racing has 11% more hydraulic flow (5.8 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson 2775 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini 190 Racing has 238% more forward gears (19 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 2775 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini 190 Racing has 13% more top speed (4.5 km/h / 2.8 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 2775 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini 190 Racing offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson 2775 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Lamborghini 190 Racing is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson 2775 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Lamborghini 190 Racing is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 190 Racing has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 2775 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources