Lamborghini R-1556 DT or WHITE 2-155?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the R-1556 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Lamborghini R-1556 DT and WHITE 2-155, with the call on each
QuestionR-1556 DT2-155Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?114 kW (153 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1556 DT”115.5 kW (154.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-155”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-1556 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the R-1556 DT and the 2-155.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the R-1556 DT and the 2-155.
Which pumps more oil for implements?54.0 L/min (14.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1556 DT”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2-155.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,903 kg (6,400 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-155”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the R-1556 DT.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,300 kg (13,889 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1556 DT”7,552 kg (16,649 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-155”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The WHITE 2-155 is 20% heavier (1,252 kg / 2,760 lb) than the Lamborghini R-1556 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R-1556 DT and the 2-155.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1556 DT”18Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-155”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the R-1556 DT and the 2-155.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1556 DT”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-155”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1556 DT”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-155”AheadThe Lamborghini R-1556 DT offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 2-155 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1556 DT”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 2-155.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1556 DT”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-155”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1981–19841976–1982Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini R-1556 DT is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The WHITE 2-155 is 20% heavier (1,252 kg / 2,760 lb) than the Lamborghini R-1556 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini R-1556 DT offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 2-155 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Lamborghini R-1556 DT is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-1556 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources