Lamborghini R-1556 DT or Massey Ferguson MF 2720 A?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the R-1556 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 2720 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 2720 A suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Lamborghini R-1556 DT and Massey Ferguson MF 2720 A, with the call on each
QuestionR-1556 DTMF 2720 ACall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?114 kW (153 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1556 DT”113.3 kW (151.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2720”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-1556 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 2720 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the R-1556 DT and the MF 2720 A.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the R-1556 DT and the MF 2720 A.
Which pumps more oil for implements?54.0 L/min (14.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1556 DT”53.3 L/min (14.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2720”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,320 kg (16,138 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2720”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the R-1556 DT.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,300 kg (13,889 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1556 DT”6,140 kg (13,536 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2720”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R-1556 DT and the MF 2720 A.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1556 DT”16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2720”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the R-1556 DT and the MF 2720 A.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1556 DT”35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2720”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 2720 A has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Lamborghini R-1556 DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1556 DT”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2720”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1556 DT”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2720”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1556 DT”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2720”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1981–19841982–1985EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 2720 A has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Lamborghini R-1556 DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-1556 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 2720 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources