Lamborghini R-1306 DT or SAME Laser 130 DT?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the R-1306 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Laser 130 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | R-1306 DT | Laser 130 DT | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 91.9 kW (123.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1306 DT” | 91.9 kW (123.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 130” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-1306 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Laser 130 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the R-1306 DT and the Laser 130 DT. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the R-1306 DT and the Laser 130 DT. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 50.8 L/min (13.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1306 DT” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Laser 130 DT. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1306 DT” | 5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 130” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,100 kg (11,244 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1306 DT” | 5,170 kg (11,398 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 130” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R-1306 DT and the Laser 130 DT. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1306 DT” | 16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 130” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 130” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the R-1306 DT. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1306 DT” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 130” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1306 DT” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 130” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1306 DT” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Laser 130 DT. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1306 DT” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 130” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1984–1996 | 1983–1996 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-1306 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Laser 130 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources