Lamborghini 775 F-Plus or Renault 80-34 PX?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 775 F-Plus has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80-34 PX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault 80-34 PX suits road haulage better on this data: 50% (2,000 kg / 4,409 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Lamborghini 775 F-Plus and Renault 80-34 PX, with the call on each
Question775 F-Plus80-34 PXCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?55.2 kW (74.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus”55.2 kW (74.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 775 F-Plus has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80-34 PX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 775 F-Plus and the 80-34 PX.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 775 F-Plus and the 80-34 PX.
Which pumps more oil for implements?56.0 L/min (14.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus”31.9 L/min (8.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”AheadThe Lamborghini 775 F-Plus has 76% more hydraulic flow (24.1 L/min / 6.4 gpm) than the Renault 80-34 PX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus”3,825 kg (8,433 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”AheadThe Renault 80-34 PX has 32% more lift (925 kg / 2,039 lb) than the Lamborghini 775 F-Plus (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,625 kg (5,787 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus”3,580 kg (7,893 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 80-34 PX is 36% heavier (955 kg / 2,105 lb) than the Lamborghini 775 F-Plus (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus”6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”AheadThe Renault 80-34 PX has 50% higher maximum permissible mass (2,000 kg / 4,409 lb) than the Lamborghini 775 F-Plus (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 775 F-Plus and the 80-34 PX.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 775 F-Plus.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3152”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1992–20051989–1993EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Lamborghini 775 F-Plus has 76% more hydraulic flow (24.1 L/min / 6.4 gpm) than the Renault 80-34 PX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 80-34 PX has 32% more lift (925 kg / 2,039 lb) than the Lamborghini 775 F-Plus (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 80-34 PX is 36% heavier (955 kg / 2,105 lb) than the Lamborghini 775 F-Plus (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 80-34 PX has 50% higher maximum permissible mass (2,000 kg / 4,409 lb) than the Lamborghini 775 F-Plus (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 775 F-Plus has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80-34 PX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources