Lamborghini R 683 (DT) or Lamborghini R-360 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the R 683 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-360 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Lamborghini R 683 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 28% (6.8 L/min / 1.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 20% (420 kg / 926 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | R 683 (DT) | R-360 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 44.1 kW (59.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 683 DT” | 44.1 kW (59.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R 683 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-360 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the R 683 (DT) and the R-360 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the R 683 (DT) and the R-360 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 31.0 L/min (8.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 683 DT” | 24.2 L/min (6.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)” | AheadThe Lamborghini R 683 (DT) has 28% more hydraulic flow (6.8 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the Lamborghini R-360 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,500 kg (5,512 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 683 DT” | 2,080 kg (4,586 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)” | AheadThe Lamborghini R 683 (DT) has 20% more lift (420 kg / 926 lb) than the Lamborghini R-360 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,240 kg (4,938 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 683 DT” | 2,550 kg (5,622 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini R-360 (DT) is 14% heavier (310 kg / 683 lb) than the Lamborghini R 683 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R 683 (DT) and the R-360 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 683 DT” | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the R 683 (DT) and the R-360 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 683 DT” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 683 DT” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)” | AheadThe Lamborghini R-360 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Lamborghini R 683 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the R 683 (DT). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 683 DT” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1982–1985 | 1969–1972 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini R 683 (DT) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Lamborghini R 683 (DT) has 28% more hydraulic flow (6.8 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the Lamborghini R-360 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini R 683 (DT) has 20% more lift (420 kg / 926 lb) than the Lamborghini R-360 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini R-360 (DT) is 14% heavier (310 kg / 683 lb) than the Lamborghini R 683 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini R-360 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Lamborghini R 683 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Lamborghini R 683 (DT) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R 683 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-360 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources