Lamborghini R-654 (DT) or Lamborghini R 684 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the R-654 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R 684 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Lamborghini R 684 (DT) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Lamborghini R-654 (DT) and Lamborghini R 684 (DT), with the call on each
QuestionR-654 (DT)R 684 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 654 DT”49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 684 DT”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-654 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R 684 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the R-654 (DT) and the R 684 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the R-654 (DT) and the R 684 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?30.0 L/min (7.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 684 DT”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the R-654 (DT).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 654 DT”3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 684 DT”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 654 DT”2,650 kg (5,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 684 DT”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R-654 (DT) and the R 684 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 654 DT”12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 684 DT”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the R-654 (DT) and the R 684 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 654 DT”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 684 DT”AheadThe Lamborghini R 684 (DT) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Lamborghini R-654 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 654 DT”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 684 DT”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the R-654 (DT) and the R 684 (DT).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 654 DT”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 684 DT”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1977–19821982–1985Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini R 684 (DT) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Lamborghini R 684 (DT) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Lamborghini R-654 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini R 684 (DT) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-654 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R 684 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources