Lamborghini R-653 (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 273?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the R-653 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 273 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson 273 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 13% (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Massey Ferguson 273 suits road haulage better on this data: 40% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Lamborghini R-653 (DT) and Massey Ferguson MF 273, with the call on each
QuestionR-653 (DT)MF 273Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?45.6 kW (61.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 653 DT”46 kW (62 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 273”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-653 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 273 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the R-653 (DT) and the MF 273.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the R-653 (DT) and the MF 273.
Which pumps more oil for implements?32.0 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 653 DT”36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 273”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 273 has 13% more hydraulic flow (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the Lamborghini R-653 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,814 kg (6,204 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 653 DT”2,650 kg (5,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 273”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the R-653 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 653 DT”); the MF 273: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 273”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,580 kg (5,688 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 653 DT”2,465 kg (5,434 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 273”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R-653 (DT) and the MF 273.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 653 DT”—No figureNo call on forward gears: no figure on record for the MF 273.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the R-653 (DT) and the MF 273.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 653 DT”35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 273”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 273 has 40% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Lamborghini R-653 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 653 DT”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 273”AheadThe Lamborghini R-653 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson 273 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the R-653 (DT) and the MF 273.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 653 DT”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 273”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1980–19851983–1987EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson 273 has 13% more hydraulic flow (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the Lamborghini R-653 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 273 has 40% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Lamborghini R-653 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini R-653 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson 273 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-653 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 273 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the R-653 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 653 DT”); the MF 273: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 273”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, forward gears, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources