Lamborghini 265 Traction or Massey Ferguson MF 9240?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Lamborghini 265 Traction: three-point lift.

  • The Lamborghini 265 Traction suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 11% (731 kg / 1,612 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Lamborghini 265 Traction and Massey Ferguson MF 9240, with the call on each
Question265 TractionMF 9240Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?163.4 kW (219.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”163.4 kW (219.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 265 Traction and the MF 9240.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 265 Traction and the MF 9240.
Which pumps more oil for implements?No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 265 Traction and the MF 9240.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,600 kg (16,755 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”6,869 kg (15,144 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”AheadThe Lamborghini 265 Traction has 11% more lift (731 kg / 1,612 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 9240 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?9,014 kg (19,872 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”9,014 kg (19,872 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”18Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 265 Traction and the MF 9240.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1994–19981994–1998EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Lamborghini 265 Traction has 11% more lift (731 kg / 1,612 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 9240 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources