Lamborghini 240 Traction or New Holland-Fiat G 240?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 240 Traction has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the G 240 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The New Holland-Fiat G 240 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 63% (49.2 L/min / 13.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 20% (1,511 kg / 3,331 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The New Holland-Fiat G 240 suits road haulage better on this data: 14% (1,650 kg / 3,638 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Lamborghini 240 Traction and New Holland-Fiat G 240, with the call on each
Question240 TractionG 240Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?179.5 kW (240.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240”176.6 kW (236.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G240”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 240 Traction has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the G 240 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 240 Traction and the G 240.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 240 Traction and the G 240.
Which pumps more oil for implements?77.6 L/min (20.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240”126.8 L/min (33.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G240”AheadThe New Holland-Fiat G 240 has 63% more hydraulic flow (49.2 L/min / 13.0 gpm) than the Lamborghini 240 Traction (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,600 kg (16,755 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240”9,111 kg (20,086 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G240”AheadThe New Holland-Fiat G 240 has 20% more lift (1,511 kg / 3,331 lb) than the Lamborghini 240 Traction (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?8,901 kg (19,623 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240”8,827 kg (19,460 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G240”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240”13,650 kg (30,093 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G240”AheadThe New Holland-Fiat G 240 has 14% higher maximum permissible mass (1,650 kg / 3,638 lb) than the Lamborghini 240 Traction (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240”16 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G240”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 240 Traction and the G 240.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G240”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G240”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G240”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G240”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1993–19941993–2002EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland-Fiat G 240 has 63% more hydraulic flow (49.2 L/min / 13.0 gpm) than the Lamborghini 240 Traction (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland-Fiat G 240 has 20% more lift (1,511 kg / 3,331 lb) than the Lamborghini 240 Traction (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland-Fiat G 240 has 14% higher maximum permissible mass (1,650 kg / 3,638 lb) than the Lamborghini 240 Traction (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 240 Traction has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the G 240 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources