Lamborghini 230 Victory or New Holland TG 230 (Traktorenlexikon)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 230 Victory has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TG 230 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The New Holland TG 230 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 22% (26.2 L/min / 6.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Lamborghini 230 Victory and New Holland TG 230 (Traktorenlexikon), with the call on each
Question230 VictoryTG 230Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?169.3 kW (227.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 230”169.9 kW (227.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 230 Victory has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TG 230 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 230 Victory and the TG 230.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 230 Victory and the TG 230.
Which pumps more oil for implements?120.3 L/min (31.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 230”146.5 L/min (38.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”AheadThe New Holland TG 230 has 22% more hydraulic flow (26.2 L/min / 6.9 gpm) than the Lamborghini 230 Victory (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 230”—No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the TG 230.
Which is heavier, for traction?8,350 kg (18,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 230”9,231 kg (20,351 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TG 230 is 11% heavier (881 kg / 1,942 lb) than the Lamborghini 230 Victory (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 230”14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?40Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 230”18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”AheadThe Lamborghini 230 Victory has 67% more forward gears (16 gears) than the New Holland TG 230 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 230”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TG 230.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 230”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 230”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 230”independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 230”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”; OECD test report 2185, 2004EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1999–20012002–2005EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland TG 230 has 22% more hydraulic flow (26.2 L/min / 6.9 gpm) than the Lamborghini 230 Victory (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland TG 230 is 11% heavier (881 kg / 1,942 lb) than the Lamborghini 230 Victory (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini 230 Victory has 67% more forward gears (16 gears) than the New Holland TG 230 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 230 Victory has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TG 230 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources