Lamborghini 105 DT Formula or Renault 113-14 TX?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 105 DT Formula has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 113-14 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Lamborghini 105 DT Formula suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Lamborghini 105 DT Formula and Renault 113-14 TX, with the call on each
Question105 DT Formula113-14 TXCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?75.8 kW (101.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 105 DT A Formula”75.8 kW (101.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-14 TX R7922”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 105 DT Formula has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 113-14 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 105 DT Formula and the 113-14 TX.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 105 DT Formula and the 113-14 TX.
Which pumps more oil for implements?42.5 L/min (11.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 105 DT A Formula”41.8 L/min (11.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-14 TX R7922”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,760 kg (10,494 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 105 DT A Formula”4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-14 TX R7922”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,770 kg (8,311 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 105 DT A Formula”5,220 kg (11,508 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-14 TX R7922”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 113-14 TX is 38% heavier (1,450 kg / 3,197 lb) than the Lamborghini 105 DT Formula (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 105 DT Formula and the 113-14 TX.
Which has the wider choice of gears?40Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 105 DT A Formula”12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-14 TX R7922”AheadThe Lamborghini 105 DT Formula has 233% more forward gears (28 gears) than the Renault 113-14 TX (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 105 DT Formula and the 113-14 TX.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 105 DT A Formula”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-14 TX R7922”AheadThe Lamborghini 105 DT Formula has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Renault 113-14 TX (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 105 DT A Formula”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-14 TX R7922”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 105 DT A Formula”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 113-14 TX.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 105 DT A Formula”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-14 TX R7922”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1989–19951981–1986Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini 105 DT Formula is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 113-14 TX is 38% heavier (1,450 kg / 3,197 lb) than the Lamborghini 105 DT Formula (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini 105 DT Formula has 233% more forward gears (28 gears) than the Renault 113-14 TX (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini 105 DT Formula has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Renault 113-14 TX (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini 105 DT Formula is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 105 DT Formula has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 113-14 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources