Kramer KL 350 or Renault N 71?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the KL 350 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the N 71 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Kramer KL 350 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 59% (10.0 L/min / 2.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Kramer KL 350 and Renault N 71, with the call on each
QuestionKL 350N 71Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?25.6 kW (34.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 350”25.4 kW (34.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V71 R7051”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the KL 350 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the N 71 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the KL 350 and the N 71.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the KL 350 and the N 71.
Which pumps more oil for implements?27.0 L/min (7.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 350”17.0 L/min (4.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V71 R7051”AheadThe Kramer KL 350 has 59% more hydraulic flow (10.0 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the Renault N 71 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?——No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the KL 350 and the N 71.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,860 kg (4,101 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 350”1,615 kg (3,560 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V71 R7051”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Kramer KL 350 is 15% heavier (245 kg / 540 lb) than the Renault N 71 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?2,550 kg (5,622 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 350”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the N 71.
Which has the wider choice of gears?10Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 350”6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V71 R7051”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the KL 350 and the N 71.
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 350”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V71 R7051”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1245Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 350”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V71 R7051”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the KL 350.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 350”dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V71 R7051”AheadThe Kramer KL 350 has an independent PTO; the Renault N 71’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 350”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V71 R7051”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1966–19681960–1963Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Kramer KL 350 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Kramer KL 350 has 59% more hydraulic flow (10.0 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the Renault N 71 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Kramer KL 350 is 15% heavier (245 kg / 540 lb) than the Renault N 71 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Kramer KL 350 has an independent PTO; the Renault N 71’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
  • The Kramer KL 350 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the KL 350 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the N 71 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO speeds.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources