Kramer KA 17 or Volvo T-425 Krabat?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Volvo T-425 Krabat: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on top speed.

  • The Volvo T-425 Krabat suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 70% (9.8 L/min / 2.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Volvo T-425 Krabat suits road haulage better on this data: 58% (11.0 km/h / 6.8 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Kramer KA 17 and Volvo T-425 Krabat, with the call on each
QuestionKA 17T-425 KrabatCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?12.5 kW (17 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KA 17”12.5 kW (16.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 425 Krabat”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the KA 17 and the T-425 Krabat.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the KA 17 and the T-425 Krabat.
Which pumps more oil for implements?14.0 L/min (3.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KA 17”23.8 L/min (6.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 425 Krabat”AheadThe Volvo T-425 Krabat has 70% more hydraulic flow (9.8 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the Kramer KA 17 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?800 kg (1,764 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 425 Krabat”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the KA 17.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,225 kg (2,701 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KA 17”1,440 kg (3,175 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 425 Krabat”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Volvo T-425 Krabat is 18% heavier (215 kg / 474 lb) than the Kramer KA 17 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the KA 17 and the T-425 Krabat.
Which has the wider choice of gears?5Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KA 17”4 to 5Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 425 Krabat”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the KA 17 and the T-425 Krabat.
Which is faster on the road?19 km/h (11.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KA 17”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 425 Krabat”AheadThe Volvo T-425 Krabat has 58% more top speed (11.0 km/h / 6.8 mph) than the Kramer KA 17 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?530 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer KA 17”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 425 Krabat”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the KA 17.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the KA 17 and the T-425 Krabat.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer KA 17”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 425 Krabat”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?19561957–1962EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Volvo T-425 Krabat has 70% more hydraulic flow (9.8 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the Kramer KA 17 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Volvo T-425 Krabat is 18% heavier (215 kg / 474 lb) than the Kramer KA 17 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Volvo T-425 Krabat has 58% more top speed (11.0 km/h / 6.8 mph) than the Kramer KA 17 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources