Kramer 450 Export or VALMET 500?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the VALMET 500: hydraulic flow. On features, the Kramer 450 Export is ahead on forward gears.
- The VALMET 500 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 21% (4.1 L/min / 1.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 450 Export | 500 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 29.4 kW (39 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | 29.6 kW (39.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 500” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 450 Export and the 500. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 450 Export and the 500. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 20.0 L/min (5.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | 24.1 L/min (6.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 500” | AheadThe VALMET 500 has 21% more hydraulic flow (4.1 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the Kramer 450 Export (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 1,450 kg (3,197 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 500” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 450 Export. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,980 kg (4,365 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | 2,077 kg (4,579 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 500” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 2,650 kg (5,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 500. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 500” | AheadThe Kramer 450 Export has 67% more forward gears (4 gears) than the VALMET 500 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 500. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 28 km/h (17.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 500” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 585/1090 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 500” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the 450 Export. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 500. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 500” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1964–1967 | 1968–1971 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The VALMET 500 has 21% more hydraulic flow (4.1 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the Kramer 450 Export (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Kramer 450 Export has 67% more forward gears (4 gears) than the VALMET 500 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources