Kramer 450 Export or Steyr 288?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Steyr 288: hydraulic flow.

  • The Steyr 288 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 60% (12.0 L/min / 3.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Kramer 450 Export and Steyr 288, with the call on each
Question450 Export288Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?29.4 kW (39 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export”29.4 kW (39 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 288”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 450 Export and the 288.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 450 Export and the 288.
Which pumps more oil for implements?20.0 L/min (5.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export”32.0 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 288”AheadThe Steyr 288 has 60% more hydraulic flow (12.0 L/min / 3.2 gpm) than the Kramer 450 Export (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?—1,600 kg (3,527 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 288”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 450 Export.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,980 kg (4,365 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export”1,930 kg (4,255 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 288”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?2,650 kg (5,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 288.
Which has the wider choice of gears?10Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 288”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 288.
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 28 km/h (17.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 288”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?585/1090 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 288”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the 450 Export.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 288.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 288”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1964–19671962–1966EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Steyr 288 has 60% more hydraulic flow (12.0 L/min / 3.2 gpm) than the Kramer 450 Export (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources