John Deere 80 Diesel or OLIVER 1450 (4 WD)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 80 Diesel has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1450 (4 WD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 80 Diesel suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 85% (22.5 L/min / 5.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) suits road haulage better on this data: 15% (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 80 Diesel | 1450 (4 WD) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 50 kW (67 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 80 Diesel” | 48.6 kW (65.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80 Diesel has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1450 (4 WD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 80 Diesel and the 1450 (4 WD). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 80 Diesel and the 1450 (4 WD). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 49.0 L/min (12.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 80 Diesel” | 26.5 L/min (7.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | AheadThe John Deere 80 Diesel has 85% more hydraulic flow (22.5 L/min / 5.9 gpm) than the OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 1,825 kg (4,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 80 Diesel. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,861 kg (8,512 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 80 Diesel” | 2,720 kg (5,997 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 80 Diesel is 42% heavier (1,141 kg / 2,515 lb) than the OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 80 Diesel and the 1450 (4 WD). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 80 Diesel” | 7 to 14Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 80 Diesel and the 1450 (4 WD). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20.0 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 80 Diesel” | 23 km/h (14.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | AheadThe OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) has 15% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the John Deere 80 Diesel (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 80 Diesel” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 80 Diesel. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 80 Diesel” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | AheadThe OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) is available with four-wheel drive; the John Deere 80 Diesel is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1955–1956 | 1967–1969 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 80 Diesel has 85% more hydraulic flow (22.5 L/min / 5.9 gpm) than the OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 80 Diesel is 42% heavier (1,141 kg / 2,515 lb) than the OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) has 15% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the John Deere 80 Diesel (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) is available with four-wheel drive; the John Deere 80 Diesel is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80 Diesel has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1450 (4 WD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources