John Deere Modell 720 Diesel or Lamborghini R 350 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Modell 720 Diesel has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R 350 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The John Deere Modell 720 Diesel suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 39% (9.5 L/min / 2.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Lamborghini R 350 (DT) suits road haulage better on this data: 39% (7.0 km/h / 4.3 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for John Deere Modell 720 Diesel and Lamborghini R 350 (DT), with the call on each
QuestionModell 720 DieselR 350 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?39.7 kW (53.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 720 Diesel”39 kW (52 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 350 (DT)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Modell 720 Diesel has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R 350 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Modell 720 Diesel and the R 350 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Modell 720 Diesel and the R 350 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?33.7 L/min (8.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 720 Diesel”24.2 L/min (6.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 350 (DT)”AheadThe John Deere Modell 720 Diesel has 39% more hydraulic flow (9.5 L/min / 2.5 gpm) than the Lamborghini R 350 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,080 kg (4,586 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 350 (DT)”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Modell 720 Diesel.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,223 kg (7,105 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 720 Diesel”1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 350 (DT)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere Modell 720 Diesel is 70% heavier (1,323 kg / 2,917 lb) than the Lamborghini R 350 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Modell 720 Diesel and the R 350 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?6Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 720 Diesel”12Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 350 (DT)”AheadThe Lamborghini R 350 (DT) has 100% more forward gears (6 gears) than the John Deere Modell 720 Diesel (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Modell 720 Diesel and the R 350 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?18 km/h (11.2 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 720 Diesel”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 350 (DT)”AheadThe Lamborghini R 350 (DT) has 39% more top speed (7.0 km/h / 4.3 mph) than the John Deere Modell 720 Diesel (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?547 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 720 Diesel”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 350 (DT)”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the Modell 720 Diesel.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 720 Diesel”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 350 (DT)”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 720 Diesel”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 350 (DT)”AheadThe Lamborghini R 350 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the John Deere Modell 720 Diesel is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1956–19581970–1973Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini R 350 (DT) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The John Deere Modell 720 Diesel has 39% more hydraulic flow (9.5 L/min / 2.5 gpm) than the Lamborghini R 350 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The John Deere Modell 720 Diesel is 70% heavier (1,323 kg / 2,917 lb) than the Lamborghini R 350 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini R 350 (DT) has 100% more forward gears (6 gears) than the John Deere Modell 720 Diesel (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini R 350 (DT) has 39% more top speed (7.0 km/h / 4.3 mph) than the John Deere Modell 720 Diesel (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini R 350 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the John Deere Modell 720 Diesel is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Lamborghini R 350 (DT) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Modell 720 Diesel has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R 350 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO speeds.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources