John Deere 60 or Volvo T-320?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 60 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T-320 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 60 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 21% (5.8 L/min / 1.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Volvo T-320 suits road haulage better on this data: 41% (7.3 km/h / 4.5 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 60 | T-320 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 27.5 kW (36.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 60” | 27.2 kW (36.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 320 D (Buster)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 60 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T-320 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 60 and the T-320. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 60 and the T-320. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 33.7 L/min (8.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 60” | 27.9 L/min (7.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 320 D (Buster)” | AheadThe John Deere 60 has 21% more hydraulic flow (5.8 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the Volvo T-320 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 1,050 kg (2,315 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 320 D (Buster)” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 60. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,680 kg (5,908 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 60” | 1,570 kg (3,461 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 320 D (Buster)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 60 is 71% heavier (1,110 kg / 2,447 lb) than the Volvo T-320 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 60 and the T-320. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 60” | 5Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 320 D (Buster)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 60 and the T-320. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 17.7 km/h (11.0 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 60” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 320 D (Buster)” | AheadThe Volvo T-320 has 41% more top speed (7.3 km/h / 4.5 mph) than the John Deere 60 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 536 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 60” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 320 D (Buster)” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the 60. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 60 and the T-320. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell 60” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 320 D (Buster)” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1952–1957 | 1961–1964 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Volvo T-320 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 60 has 21% more hydraulic flow (5.8 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the Volvo T-320 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 60 is 71% heavier (1,110 kg / 2,447 lb) than the Volvo T-320 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Volvo T-320 has 41% more top speed (7.3 km/h / 4.5 mph) than the John Deere 60 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Volvo T-320 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 60 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T-320 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources