John Deere-LANZ 710 or Renault 86?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 710 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 86 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Renault 86 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 52% (8.1 L/min / 2.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 710 | 86 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 36.8 kW (49.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710” | 36.8 kW (49.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 710 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 86 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 710 and the 86. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 710 and the 86. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 15.6 L/min (4.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710” | 23.7 L/min (6.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281” | AheadThe Renault 86 has 52% more hydraulic flow (8.1 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the John Deere-LANZ 710 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,800 kg (3,968 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710” | 1,800 kg (3,968 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,234 kg (4,925 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710” | 1,975 kg (4,354 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere-LANZ 710 is 13% heavier (259 kg / 571 lb) than the Renault 86 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 86. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 710 and the 86. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281” | AheadThe John Deere-LANZ 710 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 86 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 710. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1965–1967 | 1967–1973 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault 86 has 52% more hydraulic flow (8.1 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the John Deere-LANZ 710 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere-LANZ 710 is 13% heavier (259 kg / 571 lb) than the Renault 86 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere-LANZ 710 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 86 does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 710 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 86 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources