John Deere 920 or Volvo T-320 B?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 920 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T-320 B has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 920 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 19% (195 kg / 430 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 920 | T-320 B | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 27.2 kW (36.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 920” | 27.2 kW (36.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 320 B” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 920 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T-320 B has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 920 and the T-320 B. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 920 and the T-320 B. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 26 L/min (6.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 920” | 27.9 L/min (7.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 320 B” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,245 kg (2,745 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 920” | 1,050 kg (2,315 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 320 B” | AheadThe John Deere 920 has 19% more lift (195 kg / 430 lb) than the Volvo T-320 B (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,150 kg (4,740 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 920” | 1,440 kg (3,175 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 320 B” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 920 is 49% heavier (710 kg / 1,565 lb) than the Volvo T-320 B (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 920” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the T-320 B. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 920” | 5Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 320 B” | AheadThe John Deere 920 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Volvo T-320 B (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 920 and the T-320 B. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 920” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 320 B” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 920” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 320 B” | AheadThe John Deere 920 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Volvo T-320 B does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 920” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the T-320 B. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 920” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 320 B” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1967–1975 | 1961–1964 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 920 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 920 has 19% more lift (195 kg / 430 lb) than the Volvo T-320 B (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 920 is 49% heavier (710 kg / 1,565 lb) than the Volvo T-320 B (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 920 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Volvo T-320 B (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 920 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Volvo T-320 B does not (as stated by the sources).
- The John Deere 920 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 920 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T-320 B has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources