John Deere 8410 T or Lamborghini 265 Traction?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8410 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 265 Traction has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 8410 T | 265 Traction | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 198.7 kW (266.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T” | 193.4 kW (259.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8410 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 265 Traction has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8410 T and the 265 Traction. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8410 T and the 265 Traction. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 118.9 L/min (31.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 265 Traction. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 7,600 kg (16,755 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 8410 T. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 11,965 kg (26,378 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T” | 9,014 kg (19,872 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 8410T is 33% heavier (2,951 kg / 6,506 lb) than the Lamborghini 265 Traction (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 14,288 kg (31,500 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T” | 12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265” | AheadThe John Deere 8410T has 19% higher maximum permissible mass (2,288 kg / 5,044 lb) than the Lamborghini 265 Traction (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T” | 18 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8410 T and the 265 Traction. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265” | AheadThe Lamborghini 265 Traction has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 8410T (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265” | Sources disagreeNo call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the 8410 T. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | TracksTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T”; OECD test report 1937, 2000 | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265” | DifferDrive differs: the John Deere 8410T Tracks and the Lamborghini 265 Traction 4WD — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2000–2002 | 1994–1998 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 8410T is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 8410T is 33% heavier (2,951 kg / 6,506 lb) than the Lamborghini 265 Traction (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 8410T has 19% higher maximum permissible mass (2,288 kg / 5,044 lb) than the Lamborghini 265 Traction (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini 265 Traction has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 8410T (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 8410T is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Drive differs: the John Deere 8410T Tracks and the Lamborghini 265 Traction 4WD — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8410 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 265 Traction has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the 8410 T.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources